Heimtextil
Texworld Paris

Free membership

Receive our weekly Newsletter
and set tailored daily news alerts.

Fibres/​Yarns/​Fabrics

Filtration face-off: electrospun nanofibres versus meltblown fibres

New research into the effectiveness of electrospun nanofibres has found that nanofibre filter media provides significantly increased protection against bacteria and viruses such as COVID-19

24th August 2020

Innovation in Textiles
 |  Auckland, New Zealand

Protective, Medical/Hygiene

New research into the effectiveness of meltblown fibres and electrospun nanofibres has found nanofibre filter media provides significantly increased protection against bacteria and viruses such as COVID-19. The research, conducted by Dr Fabrice Karabulut from Revolution Fibres in New Zealand, contrasts and compares nanofibre filtration with traditional meltblown filters in light of increased global demand for PPE and the future need for more effective face masks.

Dr Karabulut says that meltblowing, a commercially successful and low-cost process for producing filtration microfibres, produces fibres with diameters in the range of 1-10 micrometres. “The structure of a meltblown filter is like a non-uniform fishing net. Its pores are 1-3 micrometres in diameter which are much larger than bacteria and viruses which are just 0.1 micrometres,” he says.

“The diameters of nanofibres range from 10-300 nanometres, which is 10-100 times smaller than conventional meltblown microfibres, meaning they are very effective in protecting against viruses such as COVID, bacteria and other toxic particles,” Dr Karabulut says.

“Electrospun nanofibre is characterised by a very large surface area and small pore diameter which significantly increases the probability of particles in the smaller, submicron and nanometre range depositing on the fibre surface – thereby improving filter efficiency.”

Increased breathability and reusability

Dr Karabulut’s research is contained in the White Paper, Melt-Blown Fibres vs. Electrospun Nanofibres as Filtration Media, which outlines the differences between nanofibre filtration capability and meltblown filtration.

As well as increased filtration performance, Dr Karabulut’s says he also found the breathability and reusable nature of nanofibre made it superior to meltblown filtration. 

“The current pandemic has amplified the need for masks to be reusable but retain effectiveness,” he says.

“A recent study testing the reusability of meltblown and nanofibre filters when cleaned with ethanol showed meltblown filters were only effective for single use due to the steep reduction of filtration efficiency after ethanol cleaning. This is because the electrostatic charge of these types of filters is lost when cleaned, leading to a dramatic drop in performance,” Dr Karabulut says. “On the other hand, it was found electrospun nanofibre filters can be successfully reused multiple times after cleaning with ethanol as the filtration efficiency remains consistent.”

Wide ranging functionality

Dr Karabulut’s adds that nanofibres are highly controllable with the electrospinning process enabling management of qualities such as absorbency, fibre diameter and surface area. Modification of these parameters allow them to filter higher amounts and a wider range of particles and contaminants than meltblown filters, he says.

In addition, Dr Karabulut says, electrospun nanofibres have low basis weight, high permeability, and tight pore size that make them appropriate for a wide range of filtration applications. This broad use extends to other applications ranging from skincare and medical uses to strengthening and acoustic sound absorption., he adds.

Meeting global demand 

When the impact of COVID-19 escalated in March, Revolution Fibres pivoted its business to accommodate large scale filter media production for N95 face masks to help bolster PPE supply both in New Zealand’s local market and overseas.

Filtration for respiratory protection from pollution and viruses is what Revolution Fibres made its name on 10 years ago, leading the commercialization of nanofibre technology in New Zealand with product lines such as air filtration for home ventilation company HRV.

Revolution Fibres advanced SETA filter media is able to trap 99% of microscopic particles such as spores, allergens, and bacteria, the company claims.

Revolution Fibres CEO Ray Connor says that adapting its filter media for face masks required specialist development as well as increasing production capacity to meet the high levels of local and international demand.

With the proliferation of counterfeit face masks globally, Connor says Revolution Fibres is also making a concerted effort to ensure its product is fully compliant with the most stringent standards including NIOSH, EN, and ASTM (N95 to N99).

“Filtration plays an important role in purifying and decontaminating two life necessities: water and air. As awareness of the related health issues has increased, and accelerated by the current COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for protection from air-borne pollution and disease has also increased,” Connor adds.

Commercially viable

Mr Connor says historically nanofibres were not able to be produced in large enough volumes and at low enough cost to be commercially viable up against existing alternatives such as meltblown. “Recently technology advancements have meant production rates of electrospun nanofibre are close to that of the conventional meltblowing process. Internationally, the nanofibre market is continuing to grow which is why we have scaled up to increase production to meet demand for not only filter media but our full suite of products,” he concludes.

Download the White Paper - Melt-Blown Fibres vs. Electrospun Nanofibres as Filtration Media

www.revolutionfibres.com

Latest Reports

Business intelligence for the fibre, textiles and apparel industries: technologies, innovations, markets, investments, trade policy, sourcing, strategy...

Find out more